2502.07875v1
Investigating photometric and spectroscopic variability in the multiply-imaged Little Red Dot A2744-QSO1
Digest
Exploiting the three lensed images of the z=7.045 LRD A2744-QSO1 with 22 yr (observer; 2.7 yr rest) delays, the authors test variability using two NIRSpec epochs and multi-epoch NIRCam. Magnification-insensitive EWs of broad Hα and Hβ vary by up to 18±3% and 22±8%, respectively, over 875 d (2.4 yr) in the rest frame, coherently across images. No significant broadband photometric variability is detected beyond ≈0.3 mag systematics, so the EW changes cannot yet be tied to line- versus continuum-driven variability. A DRW model for MBH≈4×10^7 M⊙ matches the sparse sampling, bolstering the AGN interpretation and motivating continued monitoring.
Key figures to inspect
- Figure 1: Compare the prism spectra of images A/B/C across the two NIRSpec epochs; note that the improved reductions now capture the full broad Hα profile, and the continuum-scaled zooms let you judge EW changes independent of magnification.
- Figure 2: Track the rest-frame EW evolution of Hα and Hβ between images (especially C→A), quantifying the ≈18% (Hα) and ≈22% (Hβ) drops over the 875 d rest-frame interval and the consistency between the two Balmer lines.
- Figure 3: Inspect the de-magnified, time-delay–corrected NIRCam light curves (with synthetic NIRSpec photometry) to see that scatter stays within ≈0.3 mag including systematics; also check the flagged lensing/contamination systematics, particularly for image B near a cluster galaxy.
- Figure 4: Examine DRW simulations for MBH≈4×10^7 M⊙ sampled at the actual cadence; the histograms show low probability of >0.3 mag events in F115W/F356W, explaining the nondetection of significant photometric variability.