2605.30414v1
A Rapid Evolution in the Observed Mbh/M* Relation at z > 3 Revealed via Spectro-photometric SED-Modeling
Digest
This paper re-derives host-galaxy stellar masses for 39 CEERS and RUBIES broad-line AGN at z~3.5-7 by fitting NIRSpec/PRISM spectra and narrow-line fluxes with BEAGLE-AGN, using G395M-based kinematic decompositions to separate broad and narrow emission. For non-LRD AGN, adding AGN narrow-line region and continuum components changes M* only modestly, implying that their elevated Mbh/M* values are not mainly a simple SED-fitting artifact from omitted AGN emission. The central result is a rapid transition in the observed relation: non-LRD systems at z<~3.5 are consistent with the local Mbh/M* relation, while those at z>~4.5 remain elevated. Because the shift is driven by changing M* rather than an evolving Mbh distribution, the paper favors a picture where black holes grow early and hosts assemble stellar mass quickly later, while noting that residual biases and systematics cannot be fully ruled out.
Key figures to inspect
- Figure 1. Use this figure to show how the sample is defined and how the spectroscopy is handled. It is the most likely place to anchor the 39-source CEERS plus RUBIES broad-line AGN sample, the PRISM and G395M data combination, and the broad-versus-narrow kinematic decomposition that underpins every later stellar-mass inference.
- Figure 3. Recommend the figure that directly compares BEAGLE-AGN stellar-mass estimates with and without AGN narrow-line region and continuum components, ideally split by LRD versus non-LRD behavior. This is the paper's key methodological result, because it shows that non-LRD host masses are only modestly perturbed by the added AGN terms even though LRDs remain hard to model.
- Figure 4. This should be the main science figure if it is the Mbh versus M* or Mbh/M* comparison against the local relation across redshift bins. It is the cleanest single visual for the paper's headline claim that non-LRD AGN move from near-local ratios at lower redshift to elevated ratios at z>4.5.
- Figure 5. Include the later diagnostic figure that separates the evolution of Mbh from the evolution of M* or otherwise demonstrates that the transition happens through changing stellar masses rather than changing black-hole masses. That distinction is the paper's most important physical takeaway, because it reframes the result as rapid host assembly after an earlier phase of comparatively faster black-hole growth.